skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Latest NY Times Crusade against Racing
Another article
in the NY Times 2012 crusade against the game of Horse racing . This article is titled "Racing Economics Collide with
Vetenerian's Oath" with a subtitle of " Horse-racing veterinarians
are both doctor and drugstore; the more drugs they prescribe, the more money
they make"
Typical Doom and
Gloom from Author Joe Drape and his Co-author Walter Bogdanich.
The article is
lengthy, and the authors jump back and forth throughout the article talking
about Thoroughbred's, Quarter Horses, and Standardbred's (Harness).
Do you think the
laymen can get through this article, actually read the entire article, and differentiate between the 3 different
type of racing?
We all desire a
clean game and the best in animal welfare. The issue of the Vetenerian's role
should be examined and no doubt a Vetenerian's financial greed sometimes takes
over, with or without the Trainer's blessing or knowledge, but where in the NY
Times article is the statement about the many caring vetenerian's working under
the watching eyes of honorable Trainer's and Owner's?
Maybe include a look
into the recent care of the ailing Paynter, owned by Zayat Stables. The public
received almost daily Twitter updates about Paynter's medical condition,
treatment, complications and expected progress from Twitter Accounts authored
by @A.Zayat and @JustinZayat of Zayat Stables.
There is good in
the sport, and bad, let's have a balanced look. Banish for life the cheaters
and animal abusers and put a spotlight on the owners, trainers and Vets who are
doing it right.
No comments:
Post a Comment